CLICK HERE to visit other George Slezak web sites:

 See  Timer Digest review of Stock Index Timing 

George Slezak's   www. Stock Index Timing .com   Index Page 
C 2009, George Slezak, 23371 Olde Meadowbrook Cir. Bonita Springs, FL 34134
For more information call  888-311-3400 
Use www.sit1.com as a shortcut to typing the web name of this page.

 

 

MARKET VIEWS .TV INTERVIEW CHART PAGE

 

 

The following charts are for reference to the interview of George Slezak by Ike Iossif of Market Views .TV on January 22, 2010.

LISTEN

BOTTOM LINE?  

STOCK MARKET COMMENTARY 1/22/2010

I look for the market to end January at new recovery highs. 

-----------------

GDP and the Dow Industrials

Generally, we are "technicians," not economists. We don't need to prepare detailed forecasts of GDP to forecast the markets, but we should be able to have a feel for whether the economy is growing or being restrained and consider that in our opinions of the market.

How often have you heard it said that the One Trillion Dollar deficits for the net ten years will be a high percentage of our 14 Trillion Dollar GDP? I agree. But what if GDP doubles  in ten years to 28 Trillion Dollars? The following table of GDP shows that we probably should EXPECT a doubling of GDP every then years!

Look at the following tables of GDP of the United States. Click here for source web page The never seen before Jimmy Carter deficits of 50 billion dollars were dramatic compared to the 1.8 trillion GDP of 1976, but proportionately different relative to the 4.7 Trillion Dollar GDP ten years later.

Please review the following table to gain a view of the "value" of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Dow Jones Industrials Dow high Dow low
US GDP high low close to GDP to GDP
1929 103.6 1929 386.1 195.35 248.48 3.73 1.89
1930 91.2 1930 297.25 154.45 164.58 3.26 1.69
1931 76.5 1931 196.96 71.79 77.9 2.57 0.94
1932 58.7 1932 89.87 40.56 60.26 1.53 0.69
1933 56.4 1933 110.53 49.68 98.67 1.96 0.88
1934 66 1934 111.93 84.58 104.04 1.70 1.28
1935 73.3 1935 149.42 95.95 144.13 2.04 1.31
1936 83.8 1936 186.39 141.53 179.9 2.22 1.69
1937 91.9 1937 195.59 112.54 120.85 2.13 1.22
1938 86.1 1938 158.9 97.46 154.36 1.85 1.13
1939 92.2 1939 157.77 120.04 149.99 1.71 1.30
1940 101.4 1940 153.29 110.41 131.13 1.51 1.09
1941 126.7 1941 134.27 105.52 110.96 1.06 0.83
1942 161.9 1942 120.19 92.69 119.4 0.74 0.57
1943 198.6 1943 146.41 118.84 135.89 0.74 0.60
1944 219.8 1944 152.75 134.1 151.93 0.69 0.61
1945 223 1945 196.59 150.53 192.91 0.88 0.68
1946 222.2 1946 213.36 160.49 177.2 0.96 0.72
1947 244.1 1947 187.66 161.38 181.16 0.77 0.66
1948 269.1 1948 194.49 164.07 177.3 0.72 0.61
1949 267.2 1949 200.91 160.62 200.52 0.75 0.60
1950 293.7 1950 236.63 193.94 235.42 0.81 0.66
1951 339.3 1951 277.51 234.93 269.23 0.82 0.69
1952 358.3 1952 293.5 254.7 291.9 0.82 0.71
1953 379.3 1953 295.06 254.36 280.9 0.78 0.67
1954 380.4 1954 407.17 278.91 404.39 1.07 0.73
1955 414.7 1955 490.75 385.65 488.4 1.18 0.93
1956 437.4 1956 524.37 458.21 499.47 1.20 1.05
1957 461.1 1957 523.11 416.15 435.69 1.13 0.90
1958 467.2 1958 587.44 434.04 583.65 1.26 0.93
1959 506.6 1959 683.9 571.73 679.36 1.35 1.13
1960 526.4 1960 688.21 564.23 615.89 1.31 1.07
1961 544.8 1961 741.3 606.09 731.14 1.36 1.11
1962 585.7 1962 734.38 524.55 652.1 1.25 0.90
1963 617.8 1963 773.07 643.57 762.95 1.25 1.04
1964 663.6 1964 897 760.34 874.13 1.35 1.15
1965 719.1 1965 976.61 832.74 969.26 1.36 1.16
1966 787.7 1966 1001.11 735.74 785.69 1.27 0.93
1967 832.4 1967 951.57 776.16 905.11 1.14 0.93
1968 909.8 1968 994.65 817.61 943.75 1.09 0.90
1969 984.4 1969 974.92 764.45 800.36 0.99 0.78
1970 1038.3 1970 848.23 627.46 838.92 0.82 0.60
1971 1126.8 1971 958.12 790.67 890.2 0.85 0.70
1972 1237.9 1972 1042.44 882.75 1020.02 0.84 0.71
1973 1382.3 1973 1067.2 783.56 850.86 0.77 0.57
1974 1499.5 1974 904.02 570.01 616.24 0.60 0.38
1975 1637.7 1975 888.85 619.13 852.41 0.54 0.38
1976 1824.6 1976 1026.26 848.63 1004.65 0.56 0.47
1977 2030.1 1977 1007.81 792.79 831.17 0.50 0.39
1978 2293.8 1978 917.24 736.75 805.01 0.40 0.32
1979 2562.2 1979 904.86 792.24 838.74 0.35 0.31
1980 2788.1 1980 1009.39 729.95 963.99 0.36 0.26
1981 3126.8 1981 1030.98 807.46 875 0.33 0.26
1982 3253.2 1982 1078.46 769.98 1046.54 0.33 0.24
1983 3534.6 1983 1296.95 1013.43 1258.64 0.37 0.29
1984 3930.9 1984 1295.44 1078.95 1211.57 0.33 0.27
1985 4217.5 1985 1570.87 1178.67 1546.67 0.37 0.28
1986 4460.1 1986 1971.74 1491.74 1895.95 0.44 0.33
1987 4736.4 1987 2746.65 1616.21 1938.83 0.58 0.34
1988 5100.4 1988 2195.06 1845.99 2168.57 0.43 0.36
1989 5482.1 1989 2809.08 2127.14 2753.2 0.51 0.39
1990 5800.5 1990 3024.26 2344.31 2633.66 0.52 0.40
1991 5992.1 1991 3204.61 2447.03 3168.83 0.53 0.41
1992 6342.3 1992 3435.27 3087.41 3301.11 0.54 0.49
1993 6667.4 1993 3818.92 3219.25 3754.09 0.57 0.48
1994 7085.2 1994 4002.84 3520.8 3834.44 0.56 0.50
1995 7414.7 1995 5266.69 3794.4 5117.12 0.71 0.51
1996 7838.5 1996 6623.96 5000.07 6448.27 0.85 0.64
1997 8332.4 1997 8340.14 6315.84 7908.25 1.00 0.76
1998 8793.5 1998 9457.95 7379.7 9181.43 1.08 0.84
1999 9353.5 1999 11658.68 8994.26 11497.12 1.25 0.96
2000 9951.5 2000 11908.5 9571.4 10787.99 1.20 0.96
2001 10286.2 2001 11436.42 7926.93 10021.57 1.11 0.77
2002 10642.3 2002 10728.87 7181.47 8341.63 1.01 0.67
2003 11142.1 2003 10494.44 7397.31 10453.92 0.94 0.66
2004 11867.8 2004 10895.1 9660.18 10783.01 0.92 0.81
2005 12638.4 2005 11027.15 9961.52 10717.5 0.87 0.79
2006 13398.9 2006 12566.17 10607.36 12463.15 0.94 0.79
2007 14077.6 2007 14279.96 11926.79 13264.82 1.01 0.85
2008 14441.4 2008 13338.23 7392.27 8776.39 0.92 0.51
2009 14143.3 2009 10605.65 6440.08 10428.05 0.74 0.46
US GDP high low close Dow high Dow low
Dow Jones Industrials to GDP to GDP

 

Following is a table of operating earnings of the companies in the S&P 500 since 1988. A broad view of the table shows the price of the S&P is correlated to earnings, and the PE ratios move to what could be called over optimistic at market tops. PE ratios at market bottom give little information. At market bottoms I think we need to LEAP from earnings relationship to the price of the stock index to the relationship of a return to GDP growth to the index price.

 

http://www2.standardandpoors.com/spf/xls/index/SP500EPSEST.XLS 

 

STANDARD & POOR'S INDEX SERVICES
S&P 500  12 MONTH VALUES
12 MONTH
OPERATING
EARNINGS
DATE PRICE PER SHR Ratio
(type of estimate) (bottom up)
2010 estimate $74.98
2009 estimate $56.21
2008 903.25 $49.51
2007 1468.36 $82.54
2006 1418.3 $87.72
9/30/2009 1057.08
6/30/2009 919.32 $39.79 23
3/30/2009 797.87 $43.00 19
12/31/2008 903.25 $49.51 18
9/30/2008 1166.36 $64.82 18
6/30/2008 1280 $69.73 18
3/31/2008 1322.7 $76.77 17
12/31/2007 1468.36 $82.54 18
9/30/2007 1526.75 $89.31 17
6/30/2007 1503.35 $91.47 16
3/31/2007 1420.86 $89.36 16
12/31/2006 1418.3 $87.72 16
9/30/2006 1335.85 $85.92 16
6/30/2006 1270.2 $81.73 16
3/31/2006 1294.83 $79.20 16
12/31/2005 1248.29 $76.45 16
9/30/2005 1228.81 $74.21 17
6/30/2005 1199.95 $72.25 17
3/31/2005 1180.59 $69.81 17
12/31/2004 1211.92 $67.68 18
9/30/2004 1114.56 $64.61 17
6/30/2004 1140.84 $62.14 18
3/31/2004 1126.21 $58.08 19
12/31/2003 1111.92 $54.69 20
9/30/2003 995.97 $51.75 19
6/30/2003 974.5 $48.95 20
3/31/2003 848.18 $47.67 18
12/31/2002 879.82 $46.04 19
9/30/2002 815.28 $44.04 19
6/30/2002 989.81 $41.59 24
3/31/2002 1147.39 $38.97 29
12/31/2001 1148.08 $38.85 30
9/30/2001 1040.94 $42.02 25
6/30/2001 1224.38 $47.03 26
3/31/2001 1160.33 $52.89 22
12/31/2000 1320.28 $56.13 24
9/30/2000 1436.51 $56.79 25
6/30/2000 1454.6 $55.59 26
3/31/2000 1498.58 $53.92 28
12/31/1999 1469.25 $51.68 28
9/30/1999 1282.71 $49.38 26
6/30/1999 1372.71 $46.86 29
3/31/1999 1286.37 $45.08 29
12/31/1998 1229.23 $44.27 28
9/30/1998 1017.01 $44.09 23
6/30/1998 1133.84 $44.67 25
3/31/1998 1101.75 $44.37 25
12/31/1997 970.43 $44.01 22
9/30/1997 947.28 $43.73 22
6/30/1997 885.14 $42.62 21
3/31/1997 757.12 $41.80 18
12/31/1996 740.74 $40.63 18
9/30/1996 687.33 $39.40 17
6/30/1996 670.63 $39.26 17
3/31/1996 645.5 $38.45 17
12/31/1995 615.93 $37.70 16
9/30/1995 584.41 $36.72 16
6/30/1995 544.75 $34.97 16
3/31/1995 500.71 $33.22 15
12/31/1994 459.27 $31.75 14
9/30/1994 462.71 $30.11 15
6/30/1994 444.27 $29.00 15
3/31/1994 445.77 $27.82 16
12/31/1993 466.45 $26.90 17
9/30/1993 458.93 $25.35 18
6/30/1993 450.53 $23.55 19
3/31/1993 451.67 $22.19 20
12/31/1992 435.71 $20.87 21
9/30/1992 417.8 $19.89 21
6/30/1992 408.14 $19.88 21
3/31/1992 403.69 $19.46 21
12/31/1991 417.09 $19.30 22
9/30/1991 387.86 $19.68 20
6/30/1991 371.16 $20.54 18
3/31/1991 375.22 $21.81 17
12/31/1990 330.22 $22.65 15
9/30/1990 306.05 $23.48 13
6/30/1990 358.02 $23.05 16
3/31/1990 339.94 $23.52 14
12/31/1989 353.4 $24.32 15
9/30/1989 349.15 $24.85 14
6/30/1989 317.98 $25.53 12
3/31/1989 294.87 $25.05 12
12/31/1988 277.72 $24.12 12
9/30/1988 271.91
6/30/1988 273.5
3/31/1988 258.89
12/31/1987 247.08

 

 

When I study the above tables I get some interesting thoughts for discussion!

First, the top of the GDP list shows a 50% drop in GDP from 1929 to 1933! The only drop in GDP since year 2000 was 2009! Why is this such a different answer than during the 1930's? I think it is the Fed and the Dollar.

Next, look at the relationship of the Dow to GDP. See when the Dow might be considered overpriced because it ran ahead of economic growth? Do you see places where economic growth or a stable economy and a falling Dow resulted in a cheap stock market? Are we cheap now? Does it make sense to call a 10,000 Dow relative to a $14 trillion GDP an under priced stock market?

Do you see that for the the Dow to go back under 3,000, as some suggest, GDP would have to fall to 3 to 6 trillion?

Do you understand that it is INFLATION that sets up the continuous growth of the economy and thus the continuous growth of the stock market?

Do you understand that the stock market is related to NOMINAL GDP and not inflation adjusted GDP?

Here is an idea to consider. We KNOW we were in a serious recession and that unit sales are lower than they were before the recession. But because of general price increases from rising commodity prices, GDP has not had a significant decline. When unit sales growth returns at this higher price level, GDP will spurt higher, and, that increases the target for the stock market!

Following is a 12 year chart of the WEEKLY JOBLESS CLAIMS compared to the Dow. When EMPLOYMENT FINALLY BEGINS TO GROW, WON'T THAT GROW GDP? ISN'T THERE A LOT, A REALLY LOT, OF ROOM FOR EMPLOYMENT TO GROW?

 

I think the following chart comparison of the current Dow to the Dow in 2003 shows we are in a similar place in the rise out of recession. The sloppy up and down markets, with the upward bias, is just the markets way of WAITING to see if the economy is going to catch up with the market and allow the market to leap ahead again.

 

The point I want to make is that the current position of the market can either fail and turn back down or continue higher, possibly completely recovering to new all time highs. The uncertainly of the continued recovery is in the market's wobble pattern. 

When / IF we see recovery in jobs, I think we could see a spectacular surge in the stock market! A recovery in jobs could lead a GDP growth that could indicate a MUCH higher Dow!

Good luck and good trading!

George

Click the 'Sign up' button for the FREE weekly email commentary on the Commitments of Traders Report, which also includes special Stock Index Timing notices and subscriber advisories:

 

Click on the following links for the chart 
reference to other interviews by Ike Iossif 
of Market Views .TV.

 

Click here for information about SUBSCRIBING to 
www. Commitments of Traders .com that includes 
www. Commodity Index Timing .com and www. Stock Index Timing .com
     

Click here for information about opening a managed mutual fund account using stock index mutual funds

 

 

 

George Slezak publishes the web sites www.commitmentsoftraders.com (shortcut www.cot1.com ) and www.stockindextiming.com (shortcut www.sit1.com )and www.commodityindextiming.com  (shortcut www.cit1.com ) for a combined monthly subscription of $50 per month.

 

 
   
   

Don't miss the next market timing call, subscribe to Commitments of Traders .com. The subscription to Commitments of Traders .com includes subscriber access to Stock Index Timing .com with the market timing signals and weekly stock index commentary.

Click here for information about SUBSCRIBING to 
www. Commitments of Traders .com that includes 
www. Commodity Index Timing .com and www. Stock Index Timing .com
     

Privacy Policy

For more information call George at 1-888-311-3400, or email george@   georgeslezak.com 

All aspects of any trade recommendations contained in this report are subject to modification at any time. 

FUTURES TRADING INVOLVES SIGNIFICANT RISK OF LOSS AND IS NOT SUITABLE FOR EVERYONE AND THE RISK OF LOSS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING ANY TRADES. A STOP LOSS MAY NOT LIMIT YOUR LOSS TO THE AMOUNT INTENDED.  YOU SHOULD BE FOREWARNED THAT SYSTEMS WHICH TRIGGER FREQUENT TRADING SIGNALS AS PART OF A DAY TRADING STRATEGY CAN RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL COMMISSIONS AND FEES. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. ANY STATEMENT OF FACTS HEREIN CONTAINED ARE DERIVED FROM SOURCES BELIEVED TO BE RELIABLE, BUT ARE NOT GUARANTEED AS TO ACCURACY, NOR DO THEY PURPORT TO BE COMPLETE.

ANY REFERENCE TO PERFORMANCE IS INTENDED TO BE UNDERSTOOD AS STRICTLY THEORETICAL. 

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES REGARDING HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS

HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THE RISK OF LOSS EXISTS IN FUTURES TRADING.

All traders should read the  CFTC CONSUMER ALERTS and the "COMMISSION ADVISORY" on trading systems.